Why Payer Phone Calls Still Power Health System Revenue Cycles

If payer phone calls were optional, they would already be gone.

Health systems have spent years investing in portals, EDI transactions, eligibility tools, and automation. Teams have standardized workflows, centralized operations, and pushed as much work as possible into digital channels. And yet, every day, revenue cycle teams still pick up the phone.

Not because they want to. Because they have to.

At health system scale, payer phone calls are not a failure of modernization. They are the mechanism that keeps revenue moving when everything else falls short. Until that reality is acknowledged, it is hard to have an honest conversation about where RCM time and energy actually go.

The work that still requires a human conversation

Most payer phone calls exist for one simple reason. Something is unclear, incomplete, or contradictory, and waiting is not an option.

Eligibility information does not line up across systems. A portal says one thing, the response file says another, and the patient is scheduled tomorrow. A prior authorization shows as submitted but not approved, and no one can tell you why. A claim has been pending for weeks with no actionable denial reason. Notes are vague. Status fields lag reality.

In these moments, teams call because a conversation is the fastest way to get clarity. Not perfect clarity, but enough to move the work forward.

These are not rare edge cases. In large health systems, they are daily occurrences across facilities, payers, and service lines. Phone calls become the pressure release valve for everything digital channels cannot explain.

Why portals and digital tools did not replace phone calls

There is a common assumption that payer phone work persists because organizations have not adopted the right tools. That assumption does not hold up inside health systems.

Most systems already use payer portals extensively. They submit electronically. They check status digitally. They automate what can be automated. The problem is not access. The problem is consistency.

Portals behave differently across payers and plans. Data updates lag real-world decisions. Statuses are ambiguous. Some actions still require verbal confirmation. Others require escalation that only happens when a human pushes.

When information matters, teams do not wait for batch updates. They call.

Phone calls exist because they fill the gap between what systems promise and what payers actually deliver.

Scale turns phone work into infrastructure

In a single hospital, payer phone calls are annoying but manageable. A few staff handle follow-ups. Volume fluctuates. Work ebbs and flows.

At health system scale, that dynamic changes completely.

Centralized teams handle eligibility checks, authorizations, and claims follow-ups for dozens of facilities. Volume becomes constant. Variability increases. What was once a background task becomes a primary workload.

Phone calls stop being a workaround and start functioning as infrastructure. They are how cash keeps moving. They are how schedules stay intact. They are how exceptions get resolved before they turn into write-offs.

This is one of the reasons health system RCM can look stable in metrics while teams feel overwhelmed, a dynamic explored more deeply in Why Health System RCM Metrics Hide the Real Work.

The work succeeds just enough to keep outcomes flat. The cost is absorbed in time.

Why payer phone work concentrates in centralized teams

Centralization is usually the right structural decision. It improves consistency, governance, and visibility. It also concentrates payer complexity.

When payer work is centralized, every exception from every facility flows into a smaller number of teams. Differences in contracts, local practices, and payer behavior do not disappear. They pile up.

Centralized teams become the interface between system expectations and payer reality. They absorb questions, escalations, and ambiguity from across the enterprise. When something does not make sense at the facility level, it lands with them.

This concentration is why payer phone work feels relentless in shared services environments. It is not growing because teams are inefficient. It is growing because they are the designated point of resolution.

Go deeper: When RCM Centralizes, Payer Chaos Follows

The hidden economics of hold time and follow-up

Payer phone work is expensive in a way that rarely shows up in budgets.

Hold time does not appear as a line item. Repeated follow-ups do not register as failures. Documentation after every call is invisible unless it is missing.

But the economics are real. Skilled staff spend hours waiting, retrying, and recording outcomes that do not change performance metrics. That time could be spent resolving more complex issues or improving processes upstream, but it is consumed by endurance work.

Because the work succeeds just enough, it becomes normalized. Over time, organizations accept it as the cost of doing business with payers.

Why payer phone calls resist full automation

There is a temptation to view payer phone work as something that should be fully automated away. In reality, it is resistant to complete automation for structural reasons.

Payer rules change frequently. Phone trees shift. Responses require interpretation. Conversations involve nuance, context, and judgment. Many interactions are about resolving ambiguity, not executing a script.

This does not mean automation has no role. It means automation works best when it absorbs volume and repetition, not when it promises to replace every interaction.

Health systems that have lived through long pilots understand this intuitively. They are less interested in eliminating phone calls entirely and more interested in reducing how much of that burden falls on human teams.

That skepticism toward slow, all-or-nothing solutions is part of the broader time-to-value constraint discussed in Health Systems Don’t Have an AI Problem. They Have a Time-to-Value Problem. 

What actually improves when phone work is reduced

When payer phone volume is reduced or better managed, the impact shows up quickly.

Resolution cycles shorten. Workloads become more predictable. Staff spend less time waiting and more time resolving. Burnout eases. Teams regain capacity to focus on issues that actually require human judgment.

These improvements rarely come from eliminating phone calls altogether. They come from absorbing the most repetitive, high-volume interactions so people are not spending their days on hold.

The value is not theoretical. It is felt on the floor.

Phone calls are not the problem

Payer phone calls persist because payers are complex and health systems operate at scale. They are not a sign of backwardness. They are a response to reality.

The real problem is unmanaged volume.

When thousands of calls are required to keep revenue moving, and all of that work is absorbed by centralized teams, the system becomes fragile. Not because people are failing, but because endurance work crowds out higher-value effort.

Some organizations are beginning to look for ways to absorb that volume without forcing large workflow redesigns or long implementations. Tools like SuperDial are built around that idea, supporting centralized teams by handling high-volume payer calls while fitting into existing operations.

The point is not the tool. It is the recognition that payer phone work is foundational, not incidental.

Why this matters for health system leaders

If you lead or support health system revenue cycle operations, payer phone calls are already powering your outcomes. They are the reason claims move, authorizations clear, and schedules stay intact.

Ignoring that reality makes it harder to protect your teams and harder to improve operations. Acknowledging it opens the door to more honest decisions about where time goes and where relief matters most.

Phone calls are not going away. The question is how much of that work your people should continue to absorb.

‍